Resumo Fundamento: Geralmente vista como uma característica da velhice, a fragilidade também pode ocorrer em pessoas não idosas, principalmente naquelas que sofrem de doenças crônicas. A fragilidade pode aumentar o risco operatório. Objetivos: Determinar a prevalência de fragilidade em pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de revascularização do miocárdio (CRM) e/ou troca ou reconstrução valvar e/ou cirurgia valvar, bem como a influência da fragilidade nos desfechos pós-operatórios. Métodos: Nosso estudo incluiu 100 adultos que foram submetidos a operações cardíacas eletivas consecutivas. A fragilidade foi avaliada por meio da escala de Fried. Os pacientes também realizaram um teste de caminhada de 6 minutos, e medimos as pressões inspiratória e expiratória máximas. Um valor de p < 0,05 foi considerado significativo. Resultados: De uma coorte de 100 pacientes, com base nos critérios de fragilidade de Fried, 17 pacientes (17%) foram considerados frágeis, 70 (70%) pré-frágeis e apenas 13 (13%) não frágeis. Entre os portadores de valvopatia, 11 (18,6%) foram considerados frágeis e 43 (73%) pré-frágeis. Cinquenta e três por cento dos pacientes considerados frágeis tinham menos de 60 anos (mediana=48 anos). As diferenças no fenótipo de fragilidade entre os pacientes com valvopatia e doença arterial coronariana não foram estatisticamente significativas (p=0,305). A comparação entre pacientes não frágeis, pré-frágeis e frágeis não mostrou diferença significativa na distribuição das comorbidades e do estado funcional cardíaco, independentemente da doença cardíaca. No entanto, a mortalidade hospitalar mostrou-se significativamente maior em pacientes frágeis (29,4%, p=0,026) que em pacientes pré-frágeis (8,6%) e não frágeis (0%). Conclusões: A fragilidade é prevalente mesmo entre pacientes não idosos submetidos a CRM ou cirurgia cardíaca valvar e está associada a maior mortalidade hospitalar pós-operatória.

Abstract Background: Usually viewed as a characteristic of old age, frailty may also occur in non-elderly people, primarily in those suffering from chronic disease. Frailty may increase operative risk. Objectives: To determine the prevalence of frailty patients undergoing coronary artery bypass (CABG) and/or heart valve replacement or reconstruction and/or heart valve surgery, as well as the influence of frailty on postoperative outcomes. Methods: Our study comprised 100 adults who underwent consecutive elective cardiac operations. Frailty was assessed using the Fried scale. Patients also performed a 6-minute walk test, and we measured maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures. A p value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Of a cohort of 100 patients, based on the Fried frailty criteria, 17 patients (17%) were considered frail, 70 (70%) pre-frail and only 13 (13%) were non-frail. Among patients with valvular heart disease, 11 (18.6%) were considered frail and 43 (73%) pre-frail. Fifty three percent of the patients considered frail were less than 60 years old (median=48 years old). The differences in frailty phenotype between patients with valvular heart disease and coronary artery disease were not statistically significant (p=0.305). A comparison between non-frail, pre-frail, and frail patients showed no significant difference in the distribution of comorbidities and cardiac functional status, regardless of their cardiac disease. However, hospital mortality was significantly higher in frail patients (29.4%, p=0.026) than in pre-frail patients (8.6%) and non-frail patients (0%). Conclusions: Frailty is prevalent even among non-elderly patients undergoing CABG or valvular heart surgery and is associated with higher postoperative hospital mortality.

PURPOSE: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) procedures are thought to activate systemic inflammatory reaction syndrome (SIRS). Strategies to curb systemic inflammation have been previously described. However, none of them is adequate, since "curbing" the extent of the inflammatory response requires a multimodal approach. The aim of the present mini-review is to discuss the main key points about the main principles in cardiopulmonary bypass curbing inflammation. METHODS: No systematic literature search (MEDLINE) and extracted data from the accumulated experience of the authors. The preconceived idea of an association between severe inflammation and coagulation disorders is reviewed. Also, some fundamental concepts, CPB inflammatory biomarkers, the vasoplegic syndrome and the need forindividual CPB protocols for children, diabetes and old patients, are discussed. CONCLUSION: The ways in which surgical technique (atraumatic vein harvest, biocompatibility and shear resistance of the circuit, monitoring, minimizing organ ischemia, minimal cross-clamping trauma, and blood management) are thought to curb SIRS induced by CPB and affect positively the patient outcome.Improved patient outcomes are strongly associated with these modalities of care, more than single or combinatorial drug strategies (aprotinin, tranexamic acid, pentoxifylline) or CPB modalities (minicircuits, heparin-coated circuits, retrograde autologous prime).